Top image evaluation agency DxOMark is how to evaluate China's mobile phone camera function?

In an article in a previous article, the hackers quoted the DxOMark organization's test results on the level of the current global smart phone camera. Many readers are not aware of the DxOMark organization's evaluation criteria and credibility. They have seen several media agencies in the past few days. Citing the results of this institution, it did not directly explain the results. In order to illustrate the current level of smart phone products photographed, knife-skilled specifically in this article to fully explain the current domestic mobile phone products in the DxOMark evaluation performance, but also on the current domestic mobile phone industry has no basis to call the smart phone camera level seems to be unparalleled Fudge makes a response.

Founded in 2003, DxO is a trusted industry standard for camera and lens image quality measurement and rating. Over the years, it has been recognized as the platform to provide the most rigorous hardware testing. Use industry-grade laboratory tools in DxO analysis and use the most comprehensive reference database built with thousands of DxO lenses and camera test results.

The DxO analyzer is the industry's most complete and best performing solution for measuring and evaluating camera and lens image quality, as well as assessing DxOMark scores. The DxO Analyzer is a complete system that includes software, hardware, test standards, and high-quality charts to ensure consistent, repeatable, and independent third-party results.

Currently, DxOMark's website provides product testing results and ratings in three directions: cameras, lenses, and smartphones (mobile). This score result, particularly in the photography industry, is used as the basis for product selection.

In the smartphone imaging test results list, on May 31, another Chinese smart phone was listed. It is the Meizu Pro 6s. Although the results are not very satisfactory, they can enter the list and perform an all-star concert. The manufacturers themselves say that "photographs are clearer" is much more reliable.

One, DxOMark smartphone camera performance ranking

DxOMark's camera performance on smartphones is primarily measured by photos and videos. In the photo imaging effect, the main test smart phone exposure accuracy, color reproduction, auto focus, detail performance, noise suppression, image distortion (artificial traces), flash effect seven dimensions evaluation, each dimension of 100 points, and finally formed The weighted total score is different from the camera and lens test items in the evaluation direction.

In the video evaluation, the main focus is on the exposure accuracy, color reproduction, autofocus performance, detail performance, noise suppression, image distortion (artificial traces), and image stabilization effect of the smart phone when taking video, compared with the test items when the camera is photographed. The video shooting project replaced the flash effect with a stabilization effect.

From the above test items, this set of standards can basically objectively examine the actual picture quality of smart phones when taking photos and videos.

As of June 12, 2017, in the DxOMark smartphone camera performance test rankings, there were 28 files and 68 mobile phones. The first five grades have comprehensive scores of 90, 89, 88, 87, and 86, respectively, according to the ranking of the original website: HTC U11 (90), Google Pixel (89), HTC 10 (88), Samsung Galaxy S8 (88), Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (88), Sony Xperia X Perf (88), there are five phones with 87 points, namely Huawei P10, Moto Z Force Droid, Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Plus, Sony Xperia XZ and Sony Xperia Z5; 86 points. The four phones are the Apple iPhone 7, the LG G5, the Samsung Galaxy Note V and the Samsung S6 Edge. The first five files total 15 phones, HTC accounted for two, Samsung accounted for five, Sony accounted for three, LG, Moto and Apple each, domestic machines only Huawei P10 and Moto Z Force Droid into the top five. However, at 85 minutes, Huawei Mate 9 and Meizu Pro 6s accounted for two seats, tied with LG V20.

Judging from the distribution of the top six files and a total of 18 models, there is still a gap between the level of domestically produced smart phones in terms of photography and the world-class level. However, compared with Apple, Huawei's P10 has been incompatible with Apple iPhone 7 in terms of main parameters. Bo Chung, there is still something beyond some parameters. Since there is no iPhone 7 Plus score, it is not easy to scramble to conclusions, from the actual use of the point of view, iPhone 7 Plus at least stronger than the iPhone 7.

From 84 to 50 minutes, the Apple iPhone series, Moto and Samsung, and Sony dominate. In the range of 80 to 84 minutes, the domestically-made smart phones were listed on the Moto Z Droid, Moto G Plus, Moto Droid Turbo 2, Moto X, TCL950, and Huawei P9. With 79 points or less, the domestic mobile phone models selected were millet. 5, Xiaomi 5 Plus, Nubian Z11, one plus two, Huawei P8, Meizu Pro 6 and Qi cool Q Terra, very unexpected, it is cool Q although the knife and passengers have not seen what model, but it is still selected It is surprising. Even more unexpected is that the OPPO and vivo of the main camera function are not included in a model, even if it is a level 50 of the iPhone 4 with 50 points.

Second, China's smart phone camera performance evaluation

HTC U11 is currently being defined by DxOMark as the new DxOMark leader. Let's take a look at DxOMark's review of the HTC U11.

Outstanding technology has brought outstanding results, the image is pleasing and has good color reproduction. The outdoor scene is full of vitality, fine detail and low noise. Even when shooting in such a difficult situation as walking exercise, the image stability is very good. Flash exposure is very uniform on the screen and has good detail reproduction and color reproduction. The 12-megapixel, 1 / 2.55-inch sensor combined with the f / 1.75 lens provides the hardware potential to help achieve these outstanding results.

The U11 score in terms of detail performance reached 94, which should be the score of the best detailed performance. DxOMark believes that the images taken with the HTC U11 show excellent detail performance and extremely low noise, and even in very low light conditions such as 5 Lux can achieve very good image quality. In the images taken outdoors, the details of the low-contrast area are occasionally slightly lost compared to other dominant camera phones.

HTC U11's breakdown of scores: exposure and contrast accuracy 90, color reproduction 85, autofocus level 95, detail performance 94, noise suppression 89, image distortion (artificial traces) 87, flash effects 88.

Let's take a look at Huawei's P10 review. DxOMark's definition of Huawei's P10 is "best performing".

With the overall DxOMark phone score of 87, the Huawei P10 has become one of the best smartphones we have tested for photographers. For the still life, its score of 88 points was very good, thanks to the generally good exposure under all conditions, including very low light conditions, as well as accurate white balance and good color reproduction. Details and textures are also very well preserved, producing the clearest results we have seen. The P10's autofocus is fast, accurate and repeatable in both trigger and auto modes.

Huawei P10 scores very well balanced

For smartphone video enthusiasts, the Huawei P10 offers 1080p @ 60fps and higher resolution 2160p @ 30fps motion picture capture and scored 84 points for good video scores. Video is normally exposed accurately under all conditions, with good dynamic range and accurate white balance. The fine details and textures seen in still life are still reflected in video shooting, with clear edges and a lot of detail. The video's autofocus performance is also very good. In scene changes and panning video, the focus is rapid and smooth. It should be noted that in the DxOMark test, the noise level of the Huawei P10 video screen is a bit high under low light conditions.

Meizu Pro 6S shooting proofs

Meizu Pro 6s and Huawei Mate 9 were all confirmed by DxOMark with a total score of 85. DxOMark defined the two models as "full details" and "a major step for Huawei", from which we can feel DxOMark The machine's affirmation of the camera.

Moto Z is a smart phone that is popularly underestimated by domestic users. On the DxOMark platform, it scored the highest level of domestic mobile phone photography with a high score of 87 points before the Huawei P10 appeared. DxOMark believes that the Moto Z Force Droid also provides a good performance of still images and videos, achieving a score of "photo" of 87 points and a score of "video" of 86 points. The overall result is conducive to "photograph" scores. Exposure is usually very good under a range of different lighting conditions; including the Moto Z has a good dynamic range due to its automatic HDR mode, good balance, high-contrast exposure, and neutral white balance and ingenuity Color performance. Its high resolution sensor can also perform 4K video capture, and the video continues to maintain excellent detail performance, especially in bright light. Exposure and stability are important, and the Moto Z Force Droid renders delightful, fluid videos.

DxOMark believes that the Meizu Pro 6 has a 1/2.9 inch type sensor, 12 million pixel resolution and f/2 aperture lens, which can produce satisfactory photos under all lighting conditions, usually with accurate exposure and vivid color reproduction capability . It compares well to some of the more successful devices tested by DxOMark, such as the Samsung S7 Edge, which provides excellent detail, especially in bright light conditions. In low light, the details are also very well preserved. The Meizu Pro 6s makes a good compromise between the texture and noise of the shooting and video effects. With the flash attached to the ambient light, the photos are very good, accurate exposures, pleasing color renderings and details. However, the main disadvantages encountered during testing are the very noticeable flares on the backlight photos and video when shooting bright light, which reduces overall good image quality.

Mate 9's details and transition is very good

For Huawei Mate 9, DxOMark believes that Mate 9 has excellent image quality under various conditions. Photo enthusiasts will have the opportunity to appreciate the details they retain, as well as their relatively accurate white balance. People seeking to capture action scenes will appreciate its accurate autofocus. However, some inconsistencies and illusions are part of what Mate 9 needs to overcome.

The color and black-and-white sensors that make up the main camera are 20 megapixel Sony sensors with a f/2.2 aperture and a 27mm focal length equivalent lens. One sensor is a color sensor that can capture red, green, and blue (RGB). The other is monochrome, capturing grayscale images without any intermediate color filter array. Mate 9 supports JPEG and RAW image capture and capture 1080p and 720p video.

Due to space limitations, here are listed three domestic mobile phone evaluation, we can see DxOMark for mobile phone camera evaluation of the basic standards, you can also compare some of the domestic mobile phone camera features a few features. Of course, in the first five files, Lenovo Moto Z Force Droid is also exceptionally good, with 87 points and Huawei P10, which is a product that is seriously underestimated by domestic users.

(Specifically, the main information in this article is from the DxOMark website. It is limited to Swordsman's English level and limited understanding of photographic terminology. There may be mistakes in the sorting process. We hope readers will understand.)

FTTx Accessories Clamps & Hooks

Galvanized Steel Pole Clamp,Steel Drop Wire Clamp,Galvanized Steel Hoop Fastening Retractor

Sijee Optical Communication Technology Co.,Ltd , https://www.sijee-optical.com